This joint sat in my Netflix queue for days and days and days. Everytime it came time for my next shipment, I had to keep seeing the words "Very Long Wait" next to it and it never got sent. Was it really that good that it was in such high demand? That just made me want to see "Orphan" even more. Especially after also noticing that not a single Redbox ever had it in stock. I had to secure other means to make sure that I would see it before 2009 comes to a close.
In "Orphan", Kate (Vera Farmiga) and John (Peter Sarsgaard) have been devastated by the tragic loss of their unborn child. In an effort to regain some semblance of normalcy, the couple decides to adopt another child. They found themselves drawn to a young girl named Esther (Isabelle Fuhrman) whose maturity and affability sets her apart from the rest of the children. However, after welcoming Esther into their home, a strange series of events begin to unfold which leads Kate to believe that Esther may not be all that she appears to be.
The whole concept of adopting when a couple already has children is something that has always baffled me. Especially if they already have a boy and a girl. Some folks can't have a child at all. For couples that have two, they should consider themselves grateful and stop being greedy. Maybe that's what the implied moral of "Orphan" was. They deserved what happened to them because they didn't appreciate what they already had. It may be a reach on my part, but what else is new?
The trailers for this one initially turned me off because the movie that came to mind right away was "The Good Son" with Macaulay Culkin. I just figured "Orphan" would be a similar movie with a little girl being the evil one instead of a boy. Not that "The Good Son" was a terrible movie. It was certainly obvious that Culkin did it to shake his wholesome boy image. That in itself was rather amusing because he
was a little young to be worrying about being typecast. Still, "Orphan" did not entirely follow the formula of that murderous child format thanks to an awkward twist-ending.
They do provide a nice disturbing intro to grab the attention of us horror movie junkies right away. What it also does is establishes an early tone for the Kate character and her state of mind. It puts an early doubt with the viewer. Was she so traumatized by the loss of her child that she has bouts of delusion that may create some episodes we see involving Esther or are they actually occurring?
A major plot hole that I struggled with was the couple's visit and subsequent adoption of Esther. When they go to orphanage, it seems as though they are given free reign to roam the place at will. I've never been to an orphanage before, but that just doesn't seem proper. Then when they get her, she goes home with them that same day? Shouldn't they have done a trial run? Have her visit with the other siblings first to see how she would do in that environment? Maybe if they had done that, they wouldn't have had so many deaths to worry about. Then again, we wouldn't have the movie.
One of the biggest problems I had with the storyline was how Kate and John interacted with and reacted with Esther. Kate could sense there was something disturbingly wrong with Esther, yet she couldn't sense when something was bothering her own children that have been with her all their life? Same goes for John. Except he was a worse offender. When Kate eventually caught on, he was still not suspicious of Esther even AFTER the nun (CCH Pounder) from the orphanage gave them plenty of proof that Esther had issues.
As a horror film, "Orphan" had entirely too many moments where they tried to cash in on some cheap scares. Like the old mirror partially open trick then someone pops up in it when it's closed. Really? Could you be any more predictable? It's too bad they felt the need to go that route because they did a decent enough job in building the suspense throughout the film.
I will give them props for pacing "Orphan" very well for a thriller. It doesn't seem like it was 2-hours because there are very few wasted moments anywhere in the movie. They also capitalize on one of my favorite type of movie villains: the creepy kid. Psychopathic serial killing maniacs are good for the slasher flicks, but creepy looking kids with issues will trump them everytime. Comparatively speaking, this one isn't too bad as a thriller. Just not near the classic I was expecting with the "Very long wait" message constantly staring me in the face.
My rating: C+
Recent Comments